Anker 735 vs Anker Prime 67W: A2667 and A2669 Compared

By The Gear Audit Team · Manufacturer specification check September 27, 2026.

Quick answer: decide by the ports you actually use

Choose the Anker 735 Nano II 65W (A2667) if you want a documented 45W + 20W split from its two USB-C ports, or a known 40W + 22.5W split from upper USB-C and USB-A. Choose the Anker Prime 67W (A2669) when its shorter body matters and you can accept that Anker specifies combined ceilings, without a per-port allocation, for its shared-port modes. A2667 has an especially important trap: using its lower USB-C port with USB-A cuts both to 12W maximum. The single-port 65W-versus-67W label is a smaller practical difference than this allocation behavior.

Published power limits, by connection

These are Anker’s published upper limits, not measured charging results. The Prime’s 65W two-port ceiling does not promise 65W to either individual port while both are occupied. A laptop, phone or accessory negotiates what it accepts; the charger cannot force its label maximum into a device. Anker identifies both as three-port products with two USB-C ports and one USB-A port. Its US specifications list 100–240V input for both, but that does not give either charger a foreign wall-plug shape. A2667’s official specifications show the individual allocations; A2669’s official specifications show combined shared-port ceilings.

Anker 735 Nano II 65W A2667: known splits for planning

Best for: A laptop and smaller second device when you need a stated USB-C allocation before packing one charger.

Anker’s A2667 page identifies the model as the 735 Nano II 65W and supplies a full port-allocation table. Either USB-C port can reach 65W alone, but together they are assigned 45W to C1 and 20W to C2. With USB-A, the choice of USB-C socket changes the outcome sharply: C1 + A is 40W + 22.5W, while C2 + A is only 12W + 12W. For all three outputs Anker lists 40W + 12W + 12W. This is why the physical port order matters more than the maximum printed on the charger.

Choose another if: You regularly pair the lower USB-C socket with USB-A, need more than 20W for your second USB-C device, or require a shorter body.

Source: Anker A2667 product specifications and notes. Buying guidance is editorial.

Anker Prime 67W A2669: shorter, with shared totals

Best for: A three-port travel charger where a 50 mm body length is useful and your buying decision does not depend on a guaranteed per-port split while sharing.

Anker identifies the Prime 67W GaN Wall Charger (3 Ports) as model A2669. Its two USB-C ports each have a 67W single-port ceiling; USB-A has a 22.5W single-port ceiling. For every two-port combination the US specification states 65W maximum combined, and for all three it states 64.5W maximum combined. The cited page does not publish separate C1, C2 and USB-A allotments for those shared states. Anker advises using the upper port for laptops when both USB-C ports are occupied, but that note is not a numerical guarantee.

Choose another if: Your laptop must receive a documented minimum allocation while a second device is attached, or the wider charger body blocks a nearby socket.

Source: Anker A2669 product specifications and compatibility notes. Buying guidance is editorial.

Choose by your actual charging pattern

Laptop plus USB-C phone: A2667 gives a stated 45W + 20W. On A2669, the 65W combined cap alone cannot establish what the laptop gets. Check whether the laptop can operate and charge at 45W under your normal workload. A device’s charging indicator by itself does not establish sustained input power.

Laptop plus USB-A accessory: On A2667, plug the laptop into C1 for the stated 40W + 22.5W state. Using C2 instead changes both outputs to 12W. A2669 does not document the individual split, so its higher combined ceiling is flexibility on paper rather than a promise of a specific laptop wattage.

Three devices: A2667’s 40W + 12W + 12W can be useful for a modest laptop and small accessories. A2669’s 64.5W total leaves the exact sharing unknown in Anker’s cited US specifications. Neither is a way to supply two laptops with each port’s single-device maximum.

Phone fast charging: Anker’s product note says A2667 supports Super Fast Charging for the Galaxy S22 Ultra but does not support that phone’s 45W Super Fast Charging 2.0. Do not generalize the note to every Galaxy phone or assume the Prime behaves identically. A2669’s page also says it does not support MagSafe charging for M2 MacBooks and recommends a standard USB-C to USB-C cable. Match the device maker’s protocol, cable and port requirements before treating any wattage claim as a charging-speed promise.

Practical checks before ordering

1. Write down the two or three devices used together. Their negotiated input matters more than the charger’s largest single-port number.
2. Compare the correct port state. The same A2667 USB-C socket behaves very differently when paired with USB-A than when used alone.
3. Check the cable and plug. Anker says A2667 cables are sold separately. Confirm the retailer’s package contents, USB-C cable rating and plug variant for either charger.
4. Measure the outlet space. A2669 is shorter but broader. Check neighboring plugs and the orientation of a power strip rather than using body length alone.
5. Match the exact model code. “735,” “Nano” and “Prime” span multiple Anker products. A2667 and A2669 are the identifiers used here; check the model and configuration named beside each Amazon link.

For a battery-powered travel kit, see our power bank comparison. A charger’s wattage is separate from a power bank’s capacity and airline battery rules.

Anker 735 versus Prime FAQ

Is the Prime 67W meaningfully faster than the 735 65W?

The published single-port ceiling differs by 2W. Actual charge rate depends on the device, cable and charging state. Shared-port behavior and physical fit are stronger buying distinctions than that label difference.

Can both USB-C ports supply 65W at once?

No. A2667 specifies 45W + 20W with C1 and C2 occupied. A2669 specifies 65W maximum across the pair and does not state each port’s allocation in the cited US specs.

Why does A2667 slow down with C2 and USB-A?

That is the published allocation for that connection state: 12W maximum to each. Move the higher-demand USB-C device to C1 if you also need USB-A.

Does 100–240V input mean either charger fits overseas sockets?

No. That input range describes voltage compatibility. You still need the correct physical plug or a suitable travel adapter for the destination.

Research method, primary sources and limits

We checked Anker’s current US pages for exact models A2667 and A2669 on September 27, 2026. The allocation figures, dimensions, input ranges and compatibility notes above are manufacturer statements. The device scenarios, pros, cons and recommendations are editorial judgments based on those documents. We did not buy, meter, weigh or test either charger, and we do not claim a measured charging speed, temperature or reliability result. A2669’s individual shared-port allocations are not given in the cited US specification, so they remain unknown here. Retail stock, package contents and prices can change.

Primary sources: Anker 735 Nano II A2667 product page and Anker Prime A2669 product page. Read our methodology.

Amazon price cards, when available, apply only to the named model and configuration. Check the displayed update time, seller, condition and included items. Search links may return other variants. Customer star ratings are not shown when verified API data is unavailable.

Affiliate disclosure

As an Amazon Associate, The Gear Audit earns from qualifying purchases. We may earn an affiliate commission when you buy through our links, at no extra cost to you. Read our full affiliate disclosure.